2019 Women’s GCWC survey results
Responses: 24/56 = 42%
Q1.1: Did you receive the Player Briefing Notes before the event?
Yes: 86%, No: 14%
Q1.2: If you did, was the information well-presented and useful?
Yes: 100%
Q2.1: Did you attend the player briefing meeting?
Yes: 74%, No: 26%
Q2.2: If so, was the information well-presented and useful?
Yes: 87%, No: 13%
Q3: Was the format of the event appropriate?
Yes: 100%
Q4: Was your number of games each day too many, not enough or about right?
Too many: 0%, About right: 95%, Not enough: 5%
Q5: Was the overall duration of the event too long, too short or about right?
Too long: 4%, About right 87%, Too short: 9%
Q6: Was the event well-managed?
Block stage: Good: 87%, Medium: 13%, Poor: 0%
Main event: Good: 90%, Medium: 10%, Poor: 0%
Consolation events: Good 90%, Medium: 5%, Poor: 5%
Q7: Was the event well-refereed?
Good: 65%, Medium: 35%; Poor: 0%
Q8: Did the new GC Rules cause any problems for you?
Yes: 4%, No: 96%
Q9.1: Did you make use of the on-line results?
Yes: 96%, No: 4%
Q9.2: Did you make use of the on-line commentary?
Yes: 68%, No: 32%
Q10.1: Catering at venue 1
Did you like the meals? Yes: 100%
Were they good value? Yes: 95%, No: 5%
Were they available at the right time? Yes: 89%, No: 11%
Q10.2: Catering at venue 2
Did you like the meals? Yes: 95%, No: 5%
Were they good value? Yes: 95%, No: 5%
Were they available at the right time? Yes: 95%, No: 5%
Q11.1: Were the courts at venue 1 of suitable quality?
Good: 87%, Satisfactory: 13%, Poor: 0%
Q11.2: Were the courts at venue 2 of suitable quality?
Good: 0%, Satisfactory: 74%, Poor: 26%
Q12: Were the balls of adequate quality?
Venue 1: Good: 91%, Satisfactory: 9%, Poor: 0%
Venue 2: Good: 91%, Satisfactory: 9%, Poor: 0%
Q13: Were the hoops well set?
Venue 1: Good: 74%, Satisfactory: 26%, Poor: 0%
Venue 2: Good: 56%, Satisfactory: 35%, Poor: 9%
Q14: Closing ceremony
Good: 80%, Satisfactory: 15%, Poor: 5%